The Melania Trump documentary has sparked a musical controversy, with producers revealing that several musicians refused to allow their songs to be used in the film. The documentary, which follows the US First Lady in the 20 days leading up to her husband Donald's second inauguration, has been met with mixed reactions. But here's where it gets controversial... The film's producer, Marc Beckman, has opened up about the other musicians who said no to their music featuring in the film. He revealed that the team tried to include music from a number of acts, but faced political hurdles. One such act was Guns N' Roses, who had a 'beautiful song' that they wanted to use, but the group couldn't agree on whether to grant permission, and so they couldn't move forward without universal agreement. Beckman also mentioned that they tried to use a track by Grace Jones, whom he has a 'tremendous amount of respect for'. However, she couldn't get over the political hurdle, despite the film not being political. The Prince estate also blocked the use of one of the late singer's songs at the last minute, on the grounds that 'Prince would never want his song associated with Donald Trump'. This issue of the Melania soundtrack was raised in February by Greenwood and Anderson, when they asked for their music to be removed from the film. Greenwood said that the score had been licensed by its owner, Universal, but that they hadn't consulted him, which was in breach of his composer agreement. This has sparked a debate about the role of politics in the creative process and the boundaries of artistic expression. So, what do you think? Do you think musicians should have more control over how their music is used in films, or do you think the film's producers should have more freedom to use music as they see fit? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
.png?trim=0,0,0,0&width=1200&height=800&crop=1200:800)
